October 5, 2010
by Nicole Pack
By Brian Ascher and Bryan Roberts
Having participated in healthcare IT for the last 10+ years, we decided to collect and share some lessons learned. The list is by no means exhaustive, so let us know your thoughts €“ where you disagree, what you would add, etc.
- The product must be a true €œhave-to-have€, not a €œnice-to-have€. Any healthcare IT product needs to solve an important problem for a defined customer base (providers, payors, patients) and this is where lots of companies go astray. The product needs to help someone enough for them to be compelled to adopt it, while they are busy worrying about a lot of other things, and it is not enough to have a product that helps out the €œsystem€. If you can€™t convince yourself that it is one of the top three things that your specific customer is concerned with, forget it.
- Healthcare is actually an aggregation of many small €œmarkets€. While the overall healthcare market is measured in billions €“ if not trillions €“ very few needs, ideas or businesses can span the entirety. Many companies/ideas are only applicable to a subset (breast cancer, arthritis, heartburn, etc.) of healthcare or require significant re-work as one moves from one disease area to another €“ think content for different diseases. This dynamic also substantially impacts some of the revenue stream opportunities and the critical mass needed to make a business viable. For example, pharma advertising for a given drug is targeted at patients with a specific disease, not all healthcare consumers, and so the number of overall users needed to amass a specific target population and access that ad revenue, is many multiples of that target market.
- Start-up revenue streams and value propositions are elusive. There are lots of potential revenue streams in healthcare, but many are only accessible to a business that has hit scale (perhaps $100MM revenue) and critical mass creates an ecosystem such that the network has value above and beyond the interaction between the individual customer and the product. This is especially true for advertising and data revenues, but also for lead generation and others. It is much simpler to create viable revenue streams when your business reaches a substantial size than it is to find the revenue stream that gets you from $0 to $50MM€¦ So think hard about the value proposition and revenue stream for the start-up phase of your business before you hit critical mass and dominate a space.
- Customers must have more money with your product, than without it. There is no room for broad adoption of products that are a financial drain. Remember that every participant in the healthcare system is strapped for cash €“ hospitals are lucky to run a profit, doctors€™ earnings have decreased consistently over the last decade and patients are used to €œfree€ healthcare. You have to offer hard, demonstrable ROI. You can get away without it for a small number of leading edge customers for a while, but the primary goal of those customer engagements must be to get the ROI data that will be necessary to support broader customer engagement. Adding another cost, even with a long-term ROI is very hard.
- Businesses with strong network effects are gold mines. Given that healthcare has complex problems and customers are tough to secure (long sales cycles), a network effect can solidify a first mover advantage and continually decrease sales cycles, as well as afford sub-5% annual churn rates. Happily, the healthcare industry is ripe to create businesses with network effects given the historical underinvestment in the space and the proliferation of €œbig data€ business opportunities. Every customer should benefit from the cumulative customer base, with each subsequent customer deriving and creating more value than prior customers.
- The customer is mobile. Unlike many verticals, most health care providers do not sit at their desks all day; they are doing rounds and moving between exam rooms or even buildings. Meanwhile, consumers are making decisions that impact their health (eating choices, exercise, lifestyle) while out in the real world, living their lives. This situational complexity cuts both ways. On the one hand it makes some traditional enterprise strategies more difficult, while on the other, especially when combined with the proliferation of smart wireless devices, it creates opportunities for a new breed of mobile healthcare applications not seen previously.
- Expect to have a service component to your business, but avoid becoming a customized consulting shop. Healthcare is complicated and confusing, and although technology may solve a multitude of problems, it will require some handholding and take time. There is nothing approximating shrink-wrapped software in healthcare €“ and you want to use the service component of your business to help improve your software product. There is a virtuous cycle between the software and service. On the other extreme, the technology infrastructure should not be stove piped or custom-built for each individual client, even €œmarquee€ clients. In healthcare, for a variety of reasons, there are significant pressures to bring your technology infrastructure directly under the thumb of the customer€”the servers, the code, the management of the upgrade schedule, etc. Try to resist these pressures and ensure that you build a common chassis that you own with €œplug-ins€ for individual clients as needed.
- Beware of businesses dependent upon heroics€¦Make it easy. The healthcare sector is a notorious technology laggard, and for good reason. The environment can be chaotic, collaboration is complicated and staffing is convoluted. Simplicity is key with user interfaces and alerts are essential. For businesses targeting health systems, if your business depends on the brilliance, creativity and bandwidth of hospital IT, think again. Hospital IT is massively overworked and understaffed and has a list of number one priorities a mile long. The perfect solution for hospital IT is one that requires little or no effort on their part. For business targeting consumers, it€™s dangerous to assume that consumers will wake up and start taking better care of themselves. Consumers will eventually start taking better care of themselves, but it is unlikely to occur before you run out of cash.
- Know your domain. Healthcare IT is neither healthcare nor IT. Concepts and actions that traditionally work in each of those established spaces can run afoul in Healthcare IT. Navigating this sector is complicated €“ from a regulatory perspective, privacy, relationships, etc.
- Secure customer references and studies. Winning €œlighthouse€ accounts, such as the prestigious clinics and teaching hospitals (Mayo or Johns Hopkins), can be great validation for your product or service. These customer references will earn you respect, but unfortunately many customers will look at those institutions as fundamentally different from their own situation (whether based on size, financial resources, scope, etc) and thus not relevant as case studies. Often you will need multiple, credible local references in each geography before you can enjoy the efficiencies of reference selling. Same goes for ROI and effectiveness studies.
- Do well by doing good. Healthcare can be viewed as a business or a calling, but the most successful ventures view it as both. It is hard to beat an entrepreneurial team that is powered by the dream of both financial and social rewards. So strive to create value across the board (customers, investors, community).
There is a lot of wisdom in these insights! Every health IT startup should at least consider each of these insights when putting together a business plan. Having spent the last decade at athenahealth trying to make healthcare work a little better and (hopefully) succeeding a little bit, I can say with some degree of confidence that there is a mismatch between the perception and reality of healthcare IT. These insights capture much of that mismatch.
ÐÐ°Ð¼ÐµÑ€ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÑƒÐ»ÑƒÑ‡ÑˆÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð´Ñ€Ð°Ð²Ð¾Ð¾Ñ…Ñ€Ð°Ð½ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ñ Ð¼Ð½Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑтвом идей веÑьма привлекательны , но порой они дают малый результат. Как найти ту золотую Ñередину, в реальной жизни, в интереÑах наÑелениÑ?
[translation] Intention of improving health with lots of ideas very attractive, but sometimes they give a small result. How to find the middle ground, in real life, in the interests of population?
HI Brian and Bryan
This is very insightful and informative; all points are valid. Especially point #3; the start-ups have to dig into the business to realize revenues. And opportunities are there to do so. Yes, scale is required to take advantage of all the possible revenue streams. In the meanwhile, have to scrounge around to account for other/alternate revenue streams. And this is possible in real life.
We are a start-up and have gone through the challenges. And each one of your point applies to our last 4 years. We deliver a comprehensive EHR as SaaS and we can relate to what you have pointed out very well.
1. With the mandate and incentives EHR has become must have…………..
2. We realized that EHR market is also an aggregation of many specialties; thus having developed the platform, we are addressing one specialty at a time and its the only way to meet the demands of each specialty
3.Scrounged around for all the revenue streams; while the monthly subscription revenue is the bread and butter, other revenue streams include the interfaces for the vendors who need to be connected to the clinics; this has served us well
4.Its a process of convincing the customer on TCO and ROI; with the incentives, there is some reception with this
5.Created a ECO system of various vendor partners to make the ECO system a common platform for client acquisition for us, MRI Centers, Medical Labs, Sleep Centers, etc
6.Customer is mobile and hence the SaaS model works perfect; it took a lot of conviction on our part to pursue this route. Now the clients are coming around to accepting SaaS as a viable model
7.There is a Service component; and its wise to stay away from over customization. Its better to walk away; where customization makes sense, it goes into a library which other clients can access if they feel the additional feature increases their efficiency and/or outcome
8.Yes; we have kept it as simple as possible; its chaos out there and no need to complicate any further
9.HealthIT is unique and we are happy we recognized it early on
10.That’s the only way to go; even in the ambulatory care setting its necessary to get the references from the well known/liked provider in the region
11.This is very right; it has to be a combination of both………….. we try to practice it.
Thanks for articulating very well. Feel free to contact me at anthony@ehiconnect.com; we are doing well with more than 80+ clinics on-line and more coming up every day/week. We have well addressed the needs of few specialties including Pediatrics, OB/GYN, GI, Endocrinology, Oncology, Cardiology and Internal Medicine. Working on few more.
Gentlemen,
Thank you very much for your insights. You have pointed out the key value drivers which have served our management team at their previous company (eventually sold to Misys) and here at meridianEMR. Very much on target about the applicability of ideas/processes to subsets of healthcare which has been a key strategic driver in the development of meridianEMR to market leadership in urology specific EMRs (although our technological approach is very portable to other specialties we have chosen to focus on a small set with great data value). Absolutely correct on the need for demonstrable ROI’s to customers, referenceability and the critical factor that a customer must have more money with your product that without it. Finally a word on network effects. Extremely important in our case as we view our real business opportunity in the gathering, management and analysis of the deep encounter data we capture from our ever growing user community. The growth of the network benefits the community of physicians as well as us at meridianEMR and most importantly, we hope, the patient population.
Best regards
Nestor Olivier
CFO and Director of Data Analytics